Informație de încredere. Sprijin real.

Ai întrebări despre autism, ADHD, anxietate sau depresie? Găsești ghiduri clare, verificate de specialiști. Acum, acces gratuit.

Spațiu publicitar disponibil — bannerul mare de susSpațiu publicitar disponibil — bannerul mare de sus

Explorează temele

Caută tot →

Sănătate mintală și neurodezvoltare

Afecțiuni neurologice

Evaluare Psihologica

Ca stim de unde pornim

Programeaza o evaluare

Articole și ghiduri recomandate

StudiuTraumatisme cranio-cerebraleÎncredere înaltă27.06.2026

Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury on Recovery and Days at Home Following Hip Fracture in Older Adults

This retrospective cohort study analyzed Medicare claims data (2010-2017) to assess how concurrent traumatic brain injury affects recovery outcomes in elderly patients hospitalized for hip fracture. Among 101,196 beneficiaries, those with TBI (3.1%) had higher mortality and fewer days spent at home during the 12-month follow-up period, despite being older with greater comorbidity burden.

StudiuTraumatisme cranio-cerebraleÎncredere înaltă27.06.2026

The Effect of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis: A Narrative Review

This narrative review examines how mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, particularly in females who experience disproportionately worse outcomes and higher rates of menstrual dysfunction post-injury. The authors synthesize evidence on sex differences, pituitary hormone regulation, and downstream reproductive health consequences to identify research gaps and clinical recommendations for female mTBI patients.

StudiuTraumatisme cranio-cerebraleÎncredere bună27.06.2026

External Validation of the UPFRONT Prognostic Model for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery at 6 Months

This multicenter study externally validated the UPFRONT-model, which predicts functional outcome after mild traumatic brain injury using factors like educational level, consciousness level, neck pain, and psychological variables. The model demonstrated acceptable discrimination ability but systematically underestimated recovery rates (predicted 46% vs observed 75%), suggesting need for calibration adjustments while confirming psychological variables as robust predictors.